Current:Home > InvestSenators urge Biden to end duty-free treatment for packages valued at less than $800 -WealthMap Solutions
Senators urge Biden to end duty-free treatment for packages valued at less than $800
View
Date:2025-04-12 16:32:17
WASHINGTON (AP) — Two U.S. senators looking to crack down on the number of packages from China that enter the country duty-free are calling on President Joe Biden to take executive action, saying U.S. manufacturers can’t compete with low-cost competitors they say rely on forced labor and state subsidies in key sectors.
U.S. trade law allows packages bound for American consumers and valued below a certain threshold to enter tariff-free. That threshold, under a category known as “de minimis,” stands at $800 per person, per day. The majority of the imports are retail products purchased online.
Alarmed by the large increase in such shipments from China, lawmakers in both chambers have filed legislation to alter how the U.S. treats imports valued at less than $800. Now, Sens. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, and Rick Scott, R-Fla., have sent a letter to Biden calling on him to end the duty-free treatment altogether for those products.
“The situation has reached a tipping point where vast sections of American manufacturing and retail are at stake if de minimis is not immediately addressed,” the senators wrote.
Brown and Scott singled out Temu, Shein and AliExpress in their letter as companies that “unfairly” benefit from the duty-free treatment of their goods. The surge in shipments, they said, hurts big box stores and other retailers in the U.S.
“This out-of-control problem impacts the safety and livelihoods of Americans, outsourcing not only our manufacturing, but also our retail sectors to China, which — as you know — systematically utilizes slave labor among other unconscionable practices to undermine our economy,” the senators said.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the letter, which was provided to The Associated Press.
Congress raised the threshold for expedited and duty-fee imports into the U.S. from $200 back in 2016. The argument for doing so is that it speeds up the pace of commerce and lowers costs for consumers. It also allows U.S. Customs and Border Protection to focus its resources on the bigger-ticket items that generate more tariff revenue for the federal government.
The change in duty-free treatment has led to a significant increase in “de minimis” shipments, from about 220 million packages that year to 685 million in fiscal year 2022.
The higher $800 threshold for duty-free treatment has strong backing from many in the business community. John Pickel, a senior director at the National Foreign Trade Council, a trade association that represents a broad range of companies, said that doing as the senators are urging would increase the amount of time it takes for shipments to arrive as they go through a more cumbersome inspection process at the border. And those products would cost more.
“The increase from $200 to $800 has not really been a significant driver in terms of volume,” Pickel said. “What’s really driving interest in the use of de minimis is the desire for consumers to access their products quickly and at a lower transaction cost.”
He said the average shipment that comes into the U.S. through the de minimis category is $55. But that cost would roughly double for the consumer if de minimis treatment no longer applied because importers would have to hire a customs broker and pay additional processing fees and the import duty.
veryGood! (95624)
Related
- This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
- Bling Empire's Anna Shay Dead at 62 After Stroke
- Chrissy Teigen Believed She Had an Identical Twin After Insane DNA Test Mishap
- The US Rejoins the Paris Agreement, but Rebuilding Credibility on Climate Action Will Take Time
- See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
- Parkland shooting sheriff's deputy Scot Peterson found not guilty on all counts
- Air Monitoring Reveals Troubling Benzene Spikes Officials Don’t Fully Understand
- A Most ‘Sustainable’ Vineyard in a ‘Completely Unsustainable’ Year
- Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
- Elliot Page Shares Update on Dating Life After Transition Journey
Ranking
- 'We're reborn!' Gazans express joy at returning home to north
- Trump Administration Offers Drilling Leases in the Arctic Wildlife Refuge, but No Major Oil Firms Bid
- Bill McKibben Talks about his Life in Writing and Activism
- How Much Global Warming Is Fossil Fuel Infrastructure Locking In?
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- Christine King Farris, sister of Martin Luther King Jr., dies at age 95
- TikTok's Jaden Hossler Seeking Treatment for Mental Health After Excruciating Lows
- Come & Get a Glimpse Inside Selena Gomez's European Adventures
Recommendation
Meet the volunteers risking their lives to deliver Christmas gifts to children in Haiti
Supreme Court sides with Christian postal worker who declined to work on Sundays
U.S. hostage envoy says call from Paul Whelan after Brittney Griner's release was one of the toughest he's ever had
Exxon Accused of Pressuring Witnesses in Climate Fraud Case
Average rate on 30
The US Rejoins the Paris Agreement, but Rebuilding Credibility on Climate Action Will Take Time
Illinois Passes Tougher Rules on Toxic Coal Ash Over Risks to Health and Rivers
WHO questions safety of aspartame. Here's a list of popular foods, beverages with the sweetener.