Current:Home > StocksArkansas Supreme Court upholds rejection of abortion rights petitions, blocking ballot measure -WealthMap Solutions
Arkansas Supreme Court upholds rejection of abortion rights petitions, blocking ballot measure
View
Date:2025-04-17 23:34:42
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — The Arkansas Supreme Court upheld the state’s rejection of signature petitions for an abortion rights ballot initiative on Thursday, keeping the proposal from going before voters in November.
The ruling dashed the hopes of organizers, who submitted the petitions, of getting the constitutional amendment measure on the ballot in the predominantly Republican state, where many top leaders tout their opposition to abortion.
Election officials said Arkansans for Limited Government, the group behind the measure, did not properly submit documentation regarding the signature gatherers it hired. The group disputed that assertion and argued it should have been given more time to provide any additional documents needed.
“We find that the Secretary correctly refused to count the signatures collected by paid canvassers because the sponsor failed to file the paid canvasser training certification,” the court said in a 4-3 ruling.
Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 decision removing the nationwide right to abortion, there has been a push to have voters decide the matter state by state.
Arkansas currently bans abortion at any time during a pregnancy, unless the woman’s life is endangered due to a medical emergency.
The proposed amendment would have prohibited laws banning abortion in the first 20 weeks of gestation and allowed the procedure later on in cases of rape, incest, threats to the woman’s health or life, or if the fetus would be unlikely to survive birth. It would not have created a constitutional right to abortion.
The ballot proposal lacked support from national abortion rights groups such as Planned Parenthood because it would still have allowed abortion to be banned after 20 weeks, which is earlier than other states where it remains legal.
Had they all been verified, the more than 101,000 signatures, submitted on the state’s July 5 deadline, would have been enough to qualify for the ballot. The threshold was 90,704 signatures from registered voters, and from a minimum of 50 counties.
In a earlier filing with the court, election officials said that 87,675 of the signatures submitted were collected by volunteers with the campaign. Election officials said it could not determine whether 912 of the signatures came from volunteer or paid canvassers.
Arkansans for Limited Government and election officials disagreed over whether the petitions complied with a 2013 state law requiring campaigns to submit statements identifying each paid canvasser by name and confirming that rules for gathering signatures were explained to them.
Supporters of the measure said they followed the law with their documentation, including affidavits identifying each paid gatherer. They have also argued the abortion petitions are being handled differently than other initiative campaigns this year, pointing to similar filings by two other groups.
State records show that the abortion campaign did submit, on June 27, a signed affidavit including a list of paid canvassers and a statement saying the petition rules had been explained to them. Moreover, the July 5 submission included affidavits from each paid worker acknowledging that the group provided them with all the rules and regulations required by law.
The state argued in court that this documentation did not comply because it was not signed by someone with the canvassing company rather than the initiative campaign itself. The state said the statement also needed to be submitted alongside the petitions.
veryGood! (18)
Related
- How to watch new prequel series 'Dexter: Original Sin': Premiere date, cast, streaming
- Nevada pardons board will now consider requests for posthumous pardons
- Iran’s president says US should ease sanctions to demonstrate it wants to return to nuclear deal
- Zelenskyy returns to Washington to face growing dissent among Republicans to US spending for Ukraine
- Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
- Wave of migrants that halted trains in Mexico started with migrant smuggling industry in Darien Gap
- K-Pop Group Stray Kids' Lee Know, Hyunjin and Seungmin Involved in Car Accident
- Moose charges, headbutts and stomps on woman who was walking her dog on wooded trail in Colorado
- FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
- Minnesota woman made $117,000 running illegal Facebook lottery, police say
Ranking
- Rolling Loud 2024: Lineup, how to stream the world's largest hip hop music festival
- Iran’s president says US should ease sanctions to demonstrate it wants to return to nuclear deal
- Prince William says 'optimism' and 'hope' is key to climate reform during Earthshot Prize in NYC
- Grain spat drags Ukraine’s ties with ally Poland to lowest point since start of Russian invasion
- Who are the most valuable sports franchises? Forbes releases new list of top 50 teams
- DeSantis plays up fight with House speaker after McCarthy said he is not on the same level as Trump
- Prosecutors seek life in prison for man who opened fire on New York City subway train, injuring 10
- Keeping rates higher for longer: Fed moves carefully as it battles to stamp out inflation
Recommendation
The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
Oklahoma man made hundreds of ghost guns for Mexican cartel
UK’s new online safety law adds to crackdown on Big Tech companies
Fishmongers found a rare blue lobster. Instead of selling it, they found a place it could live a happy life
The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
Homes in parts of the U.S. are essentially uninsurable due to rising climate change risks
For many displaced by clashes in Lebanon’s largest Palestinian camp, return is not an option
Kraft issues recall of processed American cheese slices due to potential choking hazard